Pleading
before the seven-member bench of the Supreme Court (SC) hearing contempt case
against Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani, Aitzaz Ahsan Wednesday said his
client never said the judicial order should not be implemented. Clarifying his
point before the apex court’s panel that began contempt proceedings against the
PM Gilani, Barrister Aitzaz said his client just has this viewpoint that the
apex court’s ruling cannot be put into action for the time being.
Heading the
bench, Justice Nasirul Mulk queried, ‘The court wrote in its order that the
verdict should summarily be implemented?’ Ahsan replied the charge sheet
against the PM Gilani is of negative nature. So, in this case, delaying the
implementation is not tantamount to non-implementation, asked Justice Mulk.
Aitzaz said
PM Gilani received show cause notice on January 16 and the judicial order dated
January 10 was addressed to the Attorney General, adding the AG did not tell
the court as a witness that he delivered the judicial order to the premier. The
Prime Minister’s counsel further argued that Jan. 16 order has it that the AG
after the delivery of the order, gave statement that he had nothing new to
tell. Do you want to give the impression that you were not delivered the order,
asked Justice Asif Saeed Khosa.
Replying to
this, Aitzaz said the AG is up to prove it, adding, “The AG should have stated
this on oath before the court; and, in this case, he will have to face my
cross-question.” Aitzaz continued that it is not aptly written in January 19
interim order that PM’s counsel emphasized on the immunity of the President
under Article-248, adding, “The matter relating the immunity under
Article-248-I will come under discussion only when you have the issue of
President or governor before you.”
The SC
adjourned the hearing till Thursday, while the bench also decided to conduct
hearing on a daily basis onwards. The seven-member bench comprises Justice
Nasir-ul-Mulk, Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany,
Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and
Justice Muhammad Ather Saeed.




No comments:
Post a Comment